Discussion:
Alternate IP
(too old to reply)
Mark McDonald
2008-07-08 05:39:11 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

I am in a siutation where my Radius server has the address of 192.168.1.9
and due to circumstances my WAN provider needs to send radius requests to
192.168.1.39. They advised that I can create an alternate IP of
192.168.1.39 on the 192.168.1.9 NIC. I have done that but it seems that
Radius is bound to the 192.168.1.9 address. Is there anyway I can "bind"
Radius to the alternate IP.

I hope that made sense.

Many thanks
S. Pidgorny <MVP>
2008-07-09 10:34:04 UTC
Permalink
Did you restart the service? Just checking.
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

* http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp *
Post by Mark McDonald
Hi there,
I am in a siutation where my Radius server has the address of 192.168.1.9
and due to circumstances my WAN provider needs to send radius requests to
192.168.1.39. They advised that I can create an alternate IP of
192.168.1.39 on the 192.168.1.9 NIC. I have done that but it seems that
Radius is bound to the 192.168.1.9 address. Is there anyway I can "bind"
Radius to the alternate IP.
I hope that made sense.
Many thanks
Mark McDonald
2008-07-10 03:37:03 UTC
Permalink
Have restarted it a few times.
Post by S. Pidgorny <MVP>
Did you restart the service? Just checking.
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-
* http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp *
Post by Mark McDonald
Hi there,
I am in a siutation where my Radius server has the address of 192.168.1.9
and due to circumstances my WAN provider needs to send radius requests to
192.168.1.39. They advised that I can create an alternate IP of
192.168.1.39 on the 192.168.1.9 NIC. I have done that but it seems that
Radius is bound to the 192.168.1.9 address. Is there anyway I can "bind"
Radius to the alternate IP.
I hope that made sense.
Many thanks
S. Pidgorny <MVP>
2008-07-14 09:38:26 UTC
Permalink
Here's the link for multihomed config:

http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/adb33d9a-905f-43d8-b7c2-ccda38e5379b1033.mspx
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

* http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp *
Post by Mark McDonald
Have restarted it a few times.
Post by S. Pidgorny <MVP>
Did you restart the service? Just checking.
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-
* http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp *
Post by Mark McDonald
Hi there,
I am in a siutation where my Radius server has the address of
192.168.1.9 and due to circumstances my WAN provider needs to send
radius requests to 192.168.1.39. They advised that I can create an
alternate IP of 192.168.1.39 on the 192.168.1.9 NIC. I have done that
but it seems that Radius is bound to the 192.168.1.9 address. Is there
anyway I can "bind" Radius to the alternate IP.
I hope that made sense.
Many thanks
mlitka
2008-08-13 17:51:51 UTC
Permalink
The document referenced here is for a 2008 NPS server. Is this same
procedure supposed to work for 2003? I have tried this on my 2003 box and
it still seems to be binding to a different secondary IP address.
Post by S. Pidgorny <MVP>
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/adb33d9a-905f-43d8-b7c2-ccda38e5379b1033.mspx
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-
* http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp *
Post by Mark McDonald
Have restarted it a few times.
Post by S. Pidgorny <MVP>
Did you restart the service? Just checking.
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-
* http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp *
Post by Mark McDonald
Hi there,
I am in a siutation where my Radius server has the address of
192.168.1.9 and due to circumstances my WAN provider needs to send
radius requests to 192.168.1.39. They advised that I can create an
alternate IP of 192.168.1.39 on the 192.168.1.9 NIC. I have done that
but it seems that Radius is bound to the 192.168.1.9 address. Is there
anyway I can "bind" Radius to the alternate IP.
I hope that made sense.
Many thanks
Loading...